Health care represents a significant portion of benefit costs in virtually all workplaces.  In an effort to address these costs at the bargaining table, both labor and management have historically limited their efforts to a few standard options - make the employer pay more, make the employee pay more, increase co-pays or decrease benefits.  There are, however, more creative alternatives for those interested in trying something different.  The Health Reimbursement Arrangement (HRA) is one area worth exploring.  Here is some information.

A relatively new program called a Health Reimbursement Arrangement (HRA) is now available and may be one means of addressing rising health care costs. HRAs have been around for many years, but the IRS officially “approved” them in 2002.
Most of you are familiar with flexible spending accounts, provided under Section 125 of the IRS Code. An employee has money withheld in this flex account, it is deducted pre-tax, and the employee then has the ability to be reimbursed for qualifying medical expenses. This allows the employee the opportunity to pay medical expenses with tax-free income, and increases the spending value of income by decreasing the tax liability. However, money put into a flexible spending account must be used by the end of the calendar year or the employee loses it. Though this can generally be avoided through proper planning, many employees avoid enrolling in flex spending plans because of this use-it-or-lose-it requirement.
The HRA, provided in Section 105 of the IRS Code, is similar to flex spending with two significant differences. First, the money is put into the plan by the Employer instead of the employee. Second, the money can roll over from year to year - even into retirement. There are few rules and employers are able to set up plans in just about any way they wish. The money is not taxable income for the employee, and the employer is not required to pay fringe benefits on contributions to HRA plans.
But there are a few rules. For example, only the employer may make contributions to the plan. The plan must pass a non-discrimination examination - usually an issue only in places with very high salaries, so it shouldn’t concern our members! If the plan is written to allow pay out of cash to employees (for example, any unused money is paid our upon retirement), such a stipulation makes all of the contributions to the HRA taxable income. So, as a practical matter, the money can never be paid out for other than qualifying medical benefits, or you essentially defeat the purpose of establishing it in the first place.
HRA and flexible spending money may be used for a wide spectrum of medical costs. Some examples: Co-pays for office visits; co-pays for prescriptions; glasses and contact lenses; dental expenses and orthodontics; mileage to and from medical appointments - virtually any medical expense that is not covered by medical insurance. And the IRS held in 2003 that this coverage also extends to over-the-counter medications. So things like aspirin, cough medicine, non-prescription allergy and sinus medication and contact lens solution are also reimbursable.
So what is the benefit of this program? Insurance premiums can be drastically reduced by increasing co-pays. Changing the co-pays for office visits from $15 to $20 with a similar increase in prescription co-pays lowered the monthly premium almost $150 for a family plan in one municipality. In order to convince the employees to accept the higher co-pays, the employer offers to put (for example) $500 a year into an HRA for each employee. The employer saves $1800 on premiums, and spends $500 on the HRA. The employee has $500 per year to apply to increased co-pays, and has the ability to carry over any portion of the $500 that is not spent that year. For an “average” employee, this may well provide better coverage than the old $15 co-pay plan, as the $500 in the HRA may be used to pay some or all of the co-pays that were required under the previous plan. This is, potentially, a classic win-win agreement.
Of course, there are some “risks.’ Most of the higher co-pay plans also include additional charges in some other areas. For example, some require the employee to make a $100 co-payment for any admission to the hospital. Some plans require a co-pay for chemotherapy, radiation and dialysis treatments that may have been covered in full under the more costly plan. It is necessary to carefully review the plans and do a side-by-side comparison so that you know if there are additional changes. But the effort may very well be worthwhile, as it may help employers and unions craft a creative solution to rising health care costs.

For added information:

Click here for a comparison chart obtained from Benico.com

Click here for a fact sheet on HRAs from the Internal Revenue Service

Click here for information on HSAs - which are plans intended for employees covered by a high deductible plan.  Research these carefully before agreeing.


Home 


  Copyright © 2008, NYS Deputies Association